Neal Richardson Datta

Our office has helped thousands of immigrants achieve the American dream ! Let us help you ! #wecanhelpyou #immigration #deportation #legal #visa #citizenship #illegalimmigrants #crosstheborder #immigrationlaw #legalaid #usacitizenship #usacitizen #immigrant #immigrationraids #immigrationattorneyproblems #immigrationattorney #immigrants #deportationdefense #americadream #deliveringanamericandream #dreamamerica #helpingothers

212 358 9690 #immigration #deportation #legal #visa #citizenship #illegalimmigrants #crosstheborder #immigrationlaw #legalaid #usacitizenship #usacitizen #immigrant #immigrationraids #immigrationattorneyproblems #immigrationattorney #immigrants #deportationdefense #abogadodeinmigracion #inmigracion #abogados #ayudalegal #legalizacion

#immigration #deportation #legal #visa #citizenship #illegalimmigrants #crosstheborder #immigrationlaw #legalaid #usacitizenship #usacitizen #immigrant #immigrationraids #immigrationattorneyproblems #immigrationattorney #immigrants #deportationdefense

On Monday Trump expanded Expedited Removal to cover the entire US and no longer just within 100 miles of the border. This policy is a danger to all but especially those born abroad and living in the US today. Now is the time to get your citizenship and protect yourself.

The Trump Administration’s Lawlessness at the Border: Stories from Tijuana - Sophia Genovese Sophia Genovese, Feb. 3, 2019 "Following the law should not be a radical idea. Yet the governments of the United States and Mexico somehow find advocacy for the codified rights of asylum seekers reprehensible....Continue reading

Here is a great piece written by Jeffrey S. Chase on Haiti, TPS and Racial Bias. The article discusses the trial going on in the Eastern District of New York in the case regarding the termination of TPS for Haiti. Jeffrey S. Chase is an immigration lawyer in New York City. Jeffrey is a former Immigration Judge, senior legal advisor at the Board of Immigration Appeals, and volunteer staff attorney at Human Rights First. He is a past recipient of AILA's annual Pro Bono Award...Continue reading

In case you are worried about whether a person born in the United States to parents, not U.S. citizens themselves, either because they are just visiting the U.S. or because they are entirely without any lawful immigration status at the time of the birth, please note that this issue has long been settled by the Supreme Court. In 1898 the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, ruled that a child born in the United States to non-citizen parents was a Unit...Continue reading

This is a great article written by one of the most knowledgeable immigration lawyers I know regarding how the new "public charge" regulations proposed by the Trump administration might affect millions of Lawful Permanent Residents and applicants for visas worldwide.

In case your interested in reading the actual newly proposed "public charge" regulations, here is the link. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys//FR-2018-10-10/pdf/2018-21106.pdf Public Charge Proposed Rule Published; 60-Day Comment Period Opens (Federal Register, Oct. 10, 2018)... Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 10, 2018 - "The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to prescribe how it determines whether an alien is inadmissible to the United States under section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) because he or she is likely at any time to become a public charge. Aliens who seek adjustment of status or a visa, or who are applicants for admission, must establish that they are not likely at any time to become a public charge, unless Congress has expressly exempted them from this ground of inadmissibility or has otherwise permitted them to seek a waiver of inadmissibility. Moreover, DHS proposes to require all aliens seeking an extension of stay or change of status to demonstrate that they have not received, are not currently receiving, nor are likely to receive, public benefits as defined in the proposed rule. DHS proposes to define ‘‘public charge’’ as the term is used in sections 212(a)(4) of the Act. DHS also proposes to define the types of public benefits that are considered in public charge inadmissibility determinations. DHS would consider an alien’s receipt of public benefits when such receipt is above the applicable threshold(s) proposed by DHS, either in terms of dollar value or duration of receipt. DHS proposes to clarify that it will make public charge inadmissibility determinations based on consideration of the factors set forth in section 212(a)(4) and in the totality of an alien’s circumstances. DHS also proposes to clarify when an alien seeking adjustment of status, who is inadmissible under section 212(a)(4) of the Act, may be granted adjustment of status in the discretion of DHS upon the giving of a public charge bond. DHS is also proposing revisions to existing USCIS information collections and new information collection instruments to accompany the proposed regulatory changes. With the publication of this proposed rule, DHS withdraws the proposed regulation on public charge that the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) published on May 26, 1999. DATES: Written comments and related material to this proposed rule, including the proposed information collections, must be received to the online docket via www.regulations.gov, or to the mail address listed in the ADDRESSES section below, on or before December 10, 2018." See more

A great article about how the Trump administrations expansion of internal immigration checkpoints further into the interior of the U.S. is impacting millions of citizens lives.

The real agenda was never due process, but to remove as many migrants as possible, as quickly as possible, with little attention to fundamental fairness.

https://www.theinvestigativefund.org//13/checkpoint-nation/